A4CWSN decided to post more personal information. Albeit not all correct information, personal information that wasn't out there on the internet before, is now out there.
The following pictures are a series of tweets that A4CWSN sent out. I opened each tweet and you can see what he's replying too.
Now, I have no problem if someone wants to use someone's name online when it's readily available. Aside from one of these tweeters, their names are NOT public on twitter. Most likely for a reason. Probably a damn good reason. For him to then turn it around and blame it on the "hatters" for having to do that? To think that it's perfectly a-ok to post personal information, it just baffles my mind.
What shocks me is that his 'supporters' see absolutely nothing wrong with these actions, and neither does he. In fact he excuses the actions easily. He says we pushed him to sink to this level? No. Everyone has free will. What they personally decide to do is their own choice. No one is forcing him to do anything.
I also find it interesting that he's been thanking Twitter, Facebook, etc for their assistance but when he posted his 'proof' of information, he posted links for Spokeo. Which in my opinion, isn't the most reliable source for information. Hey, whatever floats your boat though!
(Hey, did you know you can opt out of Spokeo creating a profile for you? Click on their privacy link at the bottom of the page and follow their easy directions!)
If he does have a lawyer, don't you think they would be telling him to stop typing? To step away from the keyboard? To let the legal system deal with these issues?
Of course, this isn't the first time that he's posted personal information. I highly suspect it won't be the last. I am always surprised at the new levels of low that he'll sink to, I know I shouldn't be, but I am.
All in the name of intimidation.
that man is a phsycopath :(
ReplyDeleteScoring and Result
The PCL-R provides a total score that indicates how closely the test subject matches the "perfect" score that a classic or prototypical psychopath would rate. Each of the twenty items is given a score of 0, 1, or 2 based on how well it applies to the subject being tested. A prototypical psychopath would receive a maximum score of 40, while someone with absolutely no psychopathic traits or tendencies would receive a score of zero. A score of 30 or above qualifies a person for a diagnosis of psychopathy. People with no criminal backgrounds normally score around 5. Many non-psychopathic criminal offenders score around 22.The twenty traits assessed by the PCL-R score are:Score 0 if it does not apply to you, score 1 if it somewhat applies, score 2 if it fully applies to you.1. Glibness and superficial charm – smooth-talking, engaging and slick.2. Grandiose self-worth – greatly inflated idea of one’s abilities and self-esteem, arrogance and a sense of superiority.3. Pathological lying – shrewd, crafty, sly and clever when moderate; deceptive, deceitful, underhanded and unscrupulous when high.4. Cunning/manipulative – uses deceit and deception to cheat others for personal gain.5. Lack of remorse or guilt - no feelings or concern for losses, pain and suffering of others, coldhearted and unempathic.6. Shallow affect / emotional poverty – limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness.7. Callous/lack of empathy – a lack of feelings toward others; cold, contemptuous and inconsiderate.8. Fails to accept responsibility for own actions – denial of responsibility and an attempt to manipulate others through this.9. Needs stimulation/prone to boredom – an excessive need for new, exciting stimulation and risk-taking.10. Parasitic lifestyle – Intentional, manipulative, selfish and exploitative financial dependence on others.11. Poor behavioral controls – expressions of negative feelings, verbal abuse and inappropriate expressions of anger.12. No realistic long-term goals – inability or constant failure to develop and accomplish long-term plans.13. Impulsiveness – behaviors lacking reflection or planning and done without considering consequences.14. Irresponsible – repeated failure to fulfill or honor commitments and obligations.15. Juvenile delinquency – criminal behavioral problems between the ages of 13-18.16. Early behavior problems – a variety of dysfunctional and unacceptable behaviors before age thirteen.17. Revocation of Conditional Release – Violating probation or other conditional release because of technicalities.18. Promiscuity – brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs and an indiscriminate choice of sexual partners.19. Many short-term marital relationships – lack of commitment to a long-term relationship.20. Criminal versatility – diversity of criminal offenses, whether or not the individual has been arrested or convicted.
__________________
Take the test Gary :(
This man is just reprehensible! Thank you for you informative blog! I will be sharing this blog!
ReplyDeleteokay it didn't show up very legible here, I'll find the link and post it.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv
As someone who had my name posted, I have to say "Thank You" for posting this blog to explain why his actions are so wrong and he is just trying to intimidate those that ask for transparency and accountability.
ReplyDeleteThe scariest part of it all is he has been to so many people's homes , that in itself would terrify me. He is a psychopath i really wish the authority's would step in already.
ReplyDeleteAlthough i do suspect by this time next year the biggest world's news is going to be
"Gary James scamming millions of special needs families charged with multiple fraud "
Wow - just.....wow. Everytime I think he can't sink lower, he proves me wrong. To post private information is bad enough - let's not forget he also posted full names and phone numbers on facebook before as well - but that he asks one lady how the weather is in her city - and then names the city and state??? I'd consider that a THREAT.
ReplyDeleteAnd to thank fb, twitter, google, etc...? Ermmm, nooo, try again. They're not helping you - IF you had gone to them, they'd have told you that you were a nutter - but the information you get, is from websites you pay to be a member of. The last one being 'Spokeo'. Do the people still donating money to A4 know what you're doing with their donations? Using it to play online detective, after you've already told everyone that the po po was on the case? If that were true, you shouldn't have needed to $$ to get the names.
I'm still waiting for the name and contact information of your attorney that is handling this matter.
What kind of name is James? Is that Douchebagian?
ReplyDelete